Monday, April 14, 2014

EXCLUSIVE: Former Brooklyn DA Hynes believes man cleared of murder was innocent


 Police Commissioner Ray Kelly and Brooklyn DA Charles Hynes discuss the sweep of the Nostrand Avenue corridor of drug dealers who were operating out of stores along the shopping district. They met at Bergen Street and Nostrand Avenue, the heart of where the arrests occurred throughout the day. Todd Maisel/New York Daily News Former Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes (right, with former Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly) said in a recent deposition that he believed a man cleared of the 1994 murder of a rabbi was not guilty.

In a stunning about-face, former Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes admitted in a recent deposition that he did not believe a man exonerated for murder was guilty — even though one of his prosecutors insisted, as the man’s conviction was vacated, “We believe in this defendant’s guilt.”


Hynes threw Assistant District Attorney Kevin Richardson under the bus during a sworn deposition in connection with a $ 150 million wrongful conviction lawsuit filed in Brooklyn Federal Court by Jabbar Collins, who spent nearly 16 years behind bars for a rabbi’s death before he was freed in 2010.


“The statement that we believe ‘he did it’ was a reference to Kevin Richardson, who believed at the time … that Mr. Collins was guilty,” Hynes explained, according to a transcript of the Dec. 19 deposition, obtained exclusively by the Daily News.


“I didn’t have that view because there was no case anymore,” Hynes said under questioning by Collins’ lawyer, Joel Rudin.


Hynes added that while Richardson may have believed Collins was guilty of murdering Rabbi Abraham Pollack in a 1994 Williamsburg robbery, “I no longer held that position.”




I no longer held that position.




Richardson was sent to federal court to defend the case in 2010 amid mounting evidence that his superior, Michael Vecchione — who originally tried the case — had committed prosecutorial misconduct by coercing and threatening witnesses to make them testify against Collins.


At the time, Brooklyn Federal Judge Dora Irizarry called the DA’s handling of the case “shameful.”


Hynes responded with a statement defending Vecchione and vowing there would be no internal investigation of the allegations of misconduct.


But Hynes, who was voted out of office last November, was singing a different tune at the deposition, where he acknowledged that “someone involved in that case” failed to inform Collins’ defense lawyer that a key witness had recanted.


Jabbar Collins (l.) leaves Brooklyn Federal Court Wednesday, June 12, 2013 with his lawyer Joel Rudin (r.) Collins was wrongly convicted of murder by the Brooklyn District Attorney's office.Aaron Showalter/New York Daily News Jabbar Collins leaves Brooklyn Federal Court on June 12.

“It was an absolute obligation on the part of a prosecutor with that kind of information to immediately turn it over to the defense attorney,” Hynes said.


“There is absolutely, never has been, any doubt in my mind that it was a clear unethical … act of misconduct.”


The Collins case is among dozens of questionable murder convictions during Hynes’ 23 years in office that have come to light in recent years and drawn heavy criticism from three federal judges.


Hynes established a panel to examine the cases but still lost his reelection bid by a landslide to ex-federal prosecutor Kenneth Thompson.


 The family of Rabbi Abraham Pollack, who was gunned down in 1995, leaves Federal Court in Brooklyn where his convicted killer may be set free due to alleged prosecutorial misconduct. Jesse Ward for New York Daily News The family of Rabbi Abraham Pollack leaves Brooklyn Federal Court as his convicted killer Jabbar Collins is set to be freed due to alleged prosecutorial misconduct.

Vecchione retired after Thompson’s victory, and Richardson was fired by the new DA.


Thompson has already released three wrongfully convicted men from the Hynes era and dropped an appeal in the case of fourth man exonerated in a murder.


Hynes has never publicly corrected Richardson’s contention that Collins is guilty, and it has even been repeated by the city’s lawyer in charge of defending the suit.


“It is a disgrace that the corporation counsel’s office is still defending this case by suggesting through innuendo, and in the absence of any such evidence, that Mr. Collins is guilty,” Rudin said in a letter to Brooklyn U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert Levy.


jmarzulli@nydailynews.com





Yahoo Local News – New York Daily News




http://ift.tt/1ezH5qt

via Great Local News: New York http://ift.tt/1iZiLP1

No comments:

Post a Comment